Difference in target dose distributions between Acuros XB and collapsed cone convolution/superposition and the impact of the tumor locations in clinical cases of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Objectives: The objective of the study is to analyze the difference in target dose distributions between Acuros XB (AXB) and collapsed cone convolution (CCC)/superposition and the impact of the tumor locations in clinical cases of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for lung cancer. Materials and Methods: Ninety-six patients underwent SABR for lung cancers Kyushu University Hospital from 2014 to 2017. We recalculated clinical plans originally calculated by AXB using CCC with the identical monitor units (MUs) and beam arrangements. We calculated the following dosimetric parameters: maximum dose (Dmax), minimum dose (Dmin), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and D95 of the planning target volume (PTV). We investigated the difference between the results of two calculations and examined the impact of tumor location. Moreover, we determined the target central dose using a thorax phantom and assessed the calculation accuracy of the two algorithms for each fraction. Results: CCC significantly overestimated the dose to PTV, compared to AXB (P < 0.05). The mean differences of Dmax, Dmin, and D95 were 1.17, 1.95, and 1.85 Gy, respectively. The mean differences of HI and CI were 0.02 and - 0.06. Dmin, HI, and D95 had significant correlations with the tumor location, and the difference was greater when the PTV was included the chest wall (P < 0.05). The discrepancy between the calculated and irradiated dose was 2.48% for CCC, whereas it was 0.14% for AXB. Conclusions: We demonstrated that CCC significantly overestimated the dose to PTV relative to AXB in clinical cases of lung SABR.

Assessment of the anatomical position of point B and the relationship between point B dose and the dose delivered to pelvic lymph nodes in CT-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: To examine the anatomical position of point B and the relationship between the dose at point B and the dose delivered to the pelvic lymph nodes in computed tomography (CT)-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-nine cervical cancer patients were treated at Kyushu University Hospital. For all cases, planning CT images obtained after the applicator insertion were imported to an Oncentra Brachy (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), and points A (dose prescription, 6 Gy) and points B were set according to the Manchester method. The pelvic lymph node regions (external iliac, internal iliac, and obturator) were contoured, and the anatomic positions of 98 points B in 49 patients were examined. Dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters (D100, D90, D50, D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc) were calculated for each lymph node region and compared with the point B dose. RESULTS: The mean bilateral dose to point B was 1.70 ±0.18 Gy, and 26 (27%) of 98 points B were not located in any pelvic lymph node regions. The DVH analysis indicated a low degree of correlation overall, and all values were significantly different from point B doses (p < 0.05), except for D0.1cc of the external iliac node (p = 0.0594) and D1cc of the internal iliac node (p = 0.0711). CONCLUSIONS: We investigated the anatomical location of point B in patients with cervical cancer who underwent brachytherapy, and the DVH analysis revealed that the point B dose was a poor surrogate for the dose delivered to the pelvic lymph nodes.